Children with Imaginary Companions Focus on Mental Characteristics When Describing Their Real‐Life Friends
Abstract
Relations between having an imaginary companion (IC) and (i) descriptions of a real‐life friend, (ii) theory of mind performance, and (iii) reported prosocial behaviour and behavioural difficulties were investigated in a sample of 5‐year‐olds (N = 159). Children who had an IC were more likely than their peers without an IC to describe their best friends with reference to their mental characteristics, but IC status was unrelated to children's theory of mind performance and reported prosocial behaviour and behavioural difficulties. These findings are discussed in the context of the proposal that there is a competence–performance gap in children's mentalizing abilities. © 2014 The Authors. Infant and Child Development published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Number of times cited: 4
- Vaughan Bell, Kathryn L. Mills, Gemma Modinos and Sam Wilkinson, Rethinking Social Cognition in Light of Psychosis: Reciprocal Implications for Cognition and Psychopathology, Clinical Psychological Science, 5, 3, (537), (2017).
- Catherine A. McMahon and Annie Bernier, Twenty years of research on parental mind-mindedness: Empirical findings, theoretical and methodological challenges, and new directions, Developmental Review, 46, (54), (2017).
- Yusuke Moriguchi, Yasuhiro Kanakogi, Naoya Todo, Yuko Okumura, Ikuko Shinohara and Shoji Itakura, Goal Attribution toward Non-Human Objects during Infancy Predicts Imaginary Companion Status during Preschool Years, Frontiers in Psychology, 7, (2016).
- Lucy Firth, Ben Alderson-Day, Natalie Woods and Charles Fernyhough, Imaginary Companions in Childhood: Relations to Imagination Skills and Autobiographical Memory in Adults, Creativity Research Journal, 27, 4, (308), (2015).
