Quick Search:

The Role of Self-Esteem and Locus-of-Control in Determining Confession Outcomes

Douglass, Melanie Dawn, Bain, Stella A., Cooke, David J. and McCarthy, Paul (2019) The Role of Self-Esteem and Locus-of-Control in Determining Confession Outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 147. pp. 292-296.

[img] Text
Douglass et al_2019_in press_SE_LoC_CD.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 16 May 2021.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Abstract

Previous research suggests that self-esteem and locus-of-control are inversely related to compliance. There is also research to suggest that low self-esteem and external locus-of-control are associated with interrogative suggestibility. While it is believed that compliance and interrogative suggestibility are risk factors for falsely confessing, previous research has not directly examined the relationship between these personality variables and confession decisions made in an experimental paradigm where ground truth is known. The present study used the Russano paradigm and involved 104 participants recruited through the Glasgow Science Centre. Participants filled out personality questionnaires and a set of cognitive exercises with a confederate. As is standard for the paradigm, they were then accused of cheating. The researcher was not aware of whether participants were guilty or innocent. During the subsequent interview, which was based on conversation management, signed confession statements were sought, with these coded as true or false based on the participant’s condition. Results indicated that having an external locus-of-control was predictive of falsely confessing, rather than denying guilt. Self-esteem and time at which a confession was made did not affect the results. This paper discusses the implications of these findings and the study's limitations.

Keywords: Self-esteem, Locus-of-control, Confessions, Individual Differences, Russano
Paradigm

Item Type: Article
Status: Published
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.006
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
School/Department: School of Psychological & Social Sciences
URI: http://ray.yorksj.ac.uk/id/eprint/3860

University Staff: Request a correction | RaY Editors: Update this record