Quick Search:

Milgram's obedience experiments: A rhetorical analysis

Gibson, Stephen ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5648-7669 (2013) Milgram's obedience experiments: A rhetorical analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52 (2). pp. 290-309.

This is the latest version of this item.

Gibson 2013 BJSP.pdf - Accepted Version

| Preview


The present paper outlines a perspective on Milgram’s obedience experiments informed by rhetorical psychology. This perspective is demonstrated through a qualitative analysis of audio recordings and transcripts from two of Milgram’s experimental conditions: ‘voice-feedback’ and ‘women as subjects’. Analysis draws attention to the way in which participants could draw the experimenter into a process of negotiation over the continuation of the experimental session, something which could lead to quite radical departures from the standardized experimental procedure, and points to the ineffectiveness of Milgram’s fourth prod (‘You have no other choice, you must go on’). These observations are discussed in terms of their implications for theory and research on dis/obedience, with a specific focus on the concepts of choice and agency and the nature and meaning of dis/obedience.

Item Type: Article
Status: Published
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02070.x
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
School/Department: School of Education, Language and Psychology
URI: https://ray.yorksj.ac.uk/id/eprint/594

Available Versions of this Item

  • Milgram's obedience experiments: A rhetorical analysis. (deposited 20 May 2015 12:03) [Currently Displayed]

University Staff: Request a correction | RaY Editors: Update this record