Quick Search:

The ape lottery: chimpanzees fail to consider spatial information when drawing statistical inferences

Call, Josep ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8597-8336, Eckert, Johanna, Duguid, Shona ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4844-0673, Rakoczy, Hannes, Hermann, Esther and Call, Josep (2021) The ape lottery: chimpanzees fail to consider spatial information when drawing statistical inferences. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 8 (3). pp. 305-324.

Eckert_2021_ABC_Apelottery_CC.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

| Preview


Humans and nonhuman great apes share a sense for intuitive statistics, making intuitive probability judgments based on proportional information. This ability is of tremendous importance, in particular for predicting the outcome of events using prior information and for inferring general regularities from limited numbers of observations. Already in infancy, humans functionally integrate intuitive statistics with other cognitive domains, rendering this type of reasoning a powerful tool to make rational decisions in a variety of contexts. Recent research suggests that chimpanzees are capable of one type of such cross-domain integration: The integration of statistical and social information. Here, we investigated whether apes can also integrate physical information into their statistical inferences. We tested 14 sanctuary-living chimpanzees in a new task setup consisting of two “gumball machine”-apparatuses that were filled with different combinations of preferred and non-preferred food items. In four test conditions, subjects decided which of two apparatuses they wanted to operate to receive a random sample, while we varied both the proportional composition of the food items as well as their spatial configuration above and below a barrier. To receive the more favorable sample, apes needed to integrate proportional and spatial information. Chimpanzees succeeded in conditions in which we provided them either with proportional information or spatial information, but they failed to correctly integrate both types of information when they were in conflict. Whether these limitations in chimpanzees' performance reflect true limits of cognitive competence or merely performance limitations due to accessory task demands is still an open question.

Item Type: Article
Status: Published
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26451/abc.
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology > BF180-198.7 Experimental psychology
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology > BF660-685 Comparative psychology
School/Department: School of Education, Language and Psychology
URI: https://ray.yorksj.ac.uk/id/eprint/9180

University Staff: Request a correction | RaY Editors: Update this record