Sheehan, Lucy, Woodward, Amie ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9579-4012, Archer, Marion, Jordan, Carol, Martland, Maisie, McDonald, David A., Parkinson, Gill, Watkins, Lou, Adamson, Joy, Drummond, Avril, Hewison, Ann, Keding, Ada, Kottam, Lucksy, Madan, Ira, McDaid, Catriona, Reed, Mike, Sinclair, Lesley, Smith, Toby O., Thomson, Louise, Wu, Qi and Baker, Paul (2024) Occupational support following arthroplasty of the lower limb (OPAL): trial protocol for a UK-wide phase III randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 14 (9).

Preview

Text e085962.full.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (730kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background In the UK, one in four patients are in work at the time of their hip or knee replacement surgery. These patients receive little support about their return to work (RTW). There is a need for an occupational support intervention that encourages safe and sustained RTW which can be integrated into National Health Service practice. We developed a two-arm intervention trial, based on a feasibility study, to assess whether an occupational support intervention (the OPAL (Occupational support for Patients undergoing Arthroplasty of the Lower limb) intervention) is effective in supporting a reduced time to full, sustained RTW compared with usual care in patients undergoing hip and knee replacement.Methods and analysis This is a multicentre, individually randomised controlled superiority trial comparing the OPAL intervention to usual care. 742 working adults listed for elective primary hip or knee replacement, who intend to RTW, will be randomised to the OPAL intervention or usual care. The intervention comprises: (1) multimedia information resources; and (2) support from a designated RTW coordinator. The primary outcome is time until ‘full’ sustained RTW without sick leave for a consecutive 4-week period. Secondary outcomes are: time to any RTW, measures of functional recovery, number of ‘sick days’ between surgery and ‘full’ sustained RTW and the use of workplace modifications to facilitate their return. A health economic evaluation and a mixed methods process evaluation will assess cost-effectiveness and the implementation, fidelity and acceptability of the intervention, respectively. Outcomes will be collected at baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12-month follow-up time points, as well as a monthly RTW questionnaire.Ethics and dissemination Dissemination will focus on supporting the wider adoption and implementation of the intervention (if effective) and will target groups for whom the results will be relevant. This trial was approved by West Midlands—Edgbaston REC 23/WM/0013.Trial registration number ISRCTN13694911.

Item Type:	Article
Status:	Published
DOI:	doi10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085962
Subjects:	R Medicine > RD Surgery
School/Department:	School of Science, Technology and Health
Institutes:	Institute for Health and Care Improvement
URI:	https://ray.yorksj.ac.uk/id/eprint/10706

University Staff: Request a correction | RaY Editors: Update this record