Madigan, Daniel J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9937-1818, Stoeber, Joachim and Passfield, Louis (2017) Perfectionism and achievement goals revisited: The 3 × 2 achievement goal framework. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 28. pp. 120-124.

Preview

Text Madigan Stoeber Passfield (2017) PSE.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (283kB) | Preview

Abstract

Objectives: Perfectionistic strivings (PS) and perfectionistic concerns (PC) have shown different profiles with the 2 × 2 achievement goals in sport. Whether PS and PC also show comparable profiles with the achievement goals of the expanded 3 × 2 framework, however, is unclear. Design: Cross-sectional. Method: We examined self-reported perfectionistic strivings, perfectionistic concerns, and the 3 × 2 achievement goals in 136 junior athletes (mean age 17.0 years). Results: The results of structural equation modeling showed that PS were positively associated with task-, self-, and other-approach goals and negatively with task- and selfavoidance goals. In contrast, PC were positively associated with task-, self-, and otheravoidance goals and negatively with task- and self-approach goals. Conclusions: The findings suggest that PS and PC show different profiles also with the 3 × 2 achievement goals which may help explain why the two perfectionism dimensions show differential relations with achievement-related outcomes in sport

Item Type:	Article
Status:	Published
DOI:	10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.10.008
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology > BF636 Applied psychology
School/Department:	School of Science, Technology and Health
URI:	https://ray.yorksj.ac.uk/id/eprint/1786

University Staff: Request a correction | RaY Editors: Update this record