Quick Search:

Terrestrial structure-from-motion: spatial error analysis of roughness and morphology

Schwendel, Arved ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2937-1748 and Milan, D J (2019) Terrestrial structure-from-motion: spatial error analysis of roughness and morphology. Geomorphology. (In Press)

This is the latest version of this item.

[img] Text
Schwendel and Milan_13_accepted.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 21 October 2020.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

[img] Image
Schwendel and Milan_figures_accepted.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 21 October 2020.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Abstract

Structure-from-Motion (SfM) photogrammetry is rapidly becoming a key tool for morphological characterisation and change detection of the earth surface. This paper demonstrates the use of Terrestrial Structure-from-Motion (TSfM) photogrammetry to acquire morphology and roughness data at the reach-scale in an upland gravel-bed river. We quantify 1) spatially-distributed error in TSfM derived Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) and 2) identify differences in roughness populations acquired from TSfM photogrammetry versus TLS. We identify an association between local topographic variation and error in the TSfM DEM. On flatter surfaces (e.g. bar and terrace surfaces), the difference between the TSfM and TLS DEMs are generally less than ±0.1 m. However, in areas of high topographic variability (>0.4 m) such as berm or terrace edges, differences between the TSfM and TLS DEMs can be up to ±1 m. Our results suggest that grain roughness estimates from the TSfM point cloud generate values twice those derived from the TLS point cloud on coarse berm areas, and up to four-fold those derived from the TLS point cloud over finer gravel bar surfaces. This finding has implications when using SfM data to derive roughness metrics for hydrodynamic modelling. Despite the use of standard filtering procedures, noise pertains in the SfM DEM and the time required for its reduction might partially outweigh the survey efficiency using SfM. Therefore, caution is needed when SfM surveys are employed for the assessment of surface roughness at a reach-scale.

Item Type: Article
Status: In Press
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.106883
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GB Physical geography
School/Department: School of Humanities, Religion & Philosophy
URI: http://ray.yorksj.ac.uk/id/eprint/4095

Available Versions of this Item

  • Terrestrial structure-from-motion: spatial error analysis of roughness and morphology. (deposited 25 Sep 2019 08:13) [Currently Displayed]

University Staff: Request a correction | RaY Editors: Update this record