Demasi, M.A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1112-8141 (2020) Post-truth Politics and Discursive Psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14 (9).

Preview	Text spc3.12556.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (692kB) | Preview
Preview	Text Post-truth politics & DP (RaY).pdf - Accepted Version Download (294kB) | Preview
	Text (Invited peer-reviewed journal for Social And Personality Psychology Compass) Post-truth politics & DP (RaY).docx - Accepted Version Download (41kB)

Abstract

This paper argues for the potential of discursive psychology (DP) in the study of post-truth politics. Work produced outside of psychology is considered, particularly from political science and international relations, which have made a promising start. Providing an overview of this body of research, I argue for their respective strengths and weaknesses. The literature so far tends to work with the notion that truth and emotion are matters that are, or at least should be, distinguishable. Instead, I argue that, rather than lament the blurring between truth and untruth, one should look to how these unfold as matters of practical concern in political discourse. DP is a tool particularly suited to the task; it highlights the importance of viewing ‘truth’ as a rhetorical resource. In this light, we can view post-truth politics as a rhetorical matter rather than a degeneration of truth.

Item Type:	Article
Status:	Published
DOI:	10.1111/spc3.12556
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) J Political Science > JZ International relations
School/Department:	School of Education, Language and Psychology
URI:	https://ray.yorksj.ac.uk/id/eprint/4590

University Staff: Request a correction | RaY Editors: Update this record