Maxwell, Joseph, Bannell, Daniel, Brislane, Áine ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3214-6544, Carter, Sophie ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2815-7360, Miller, Gemma, Roberts, Kirsty, Hopkins, Nicola, Low, David, Carter, Howard, Thompson, Andrew, Claassen, Jurgen, Thijssen, Dick and Jones, Helen (2022) The impact of age, sex, cardio‑respiratory fitness, and cardiovascular disease risk on dynamic cerebral autoregulation and baroreflex sensitivity. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 122. pp. 1531-1541.

Preview

Text Maxwell(2022) The impact of age, sex, cardio‑respiratory ftness, and CVD risk on dynamic cerebral autoregulation and baroreflex sensitvity.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (723kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background
Humans display an age-related decline in cerebral blood flow and increase in blood pressure (BP), but changes in the underlying control mechanisms across the lifespan are less well understood. We aimed to; (1) examine the impact of age, sex, cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, and cardio-respiratory fitness on dynamic cerebral autoregulation and cardiac baroreflex sensitivity, and (2) explore the relationships between dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) and cardiac baroreflex sensitivity (cBRS).

Methods
206 participants aged 18–70 years were stratified into age categories. Cerebral blood flow velocity was measured using transcranial Doppler ultrasound. Repeated squat-stand manoeuvres were performed (0.10 Hz), and transfer function analysis was used to assess dCA and cBRS. Multivariable linear regression was used to examine the influence of age, sex, CVD risk, and cardio-respiratory fitness on dCA and cBRS. Linear models determined the relationship between dCA and cBRS.

Results
Age, sex, CVD risk, and cardio-respiratory fitness did not impact dCA normalised gain, phase, or coherence with minimal change in all models (P > 0.05). cBRS gain was attenuated with age when adjusted for sex and CVD risk (young–older; β = − 2.86 P < 0.001) along with cBRS phase (young–older; β = − 0.44, P < 0.001). There was no correlation between dCA normalised gain and phase with either parameter of cBRS.

Item Type:	Article
Status:	Published
DOI:	10.1007/s00421-022-04933-3
Subjects:	Q Science > QP Physiology
School/Department:	School of Science, Technology and Health
URI:	https://ray.yorksj.ac.uk/id/eprint/6313

University Staff: Request a correction | RaY Editors: Update this record