Quick Search:

Temporal Binding, Causation, and Agency: Developing a New Theoretical Framework

Hoerl, Christoph, Lorimer, Sara, McCormack, Teresa, Lagnado, David A., Blakey, Emma, Tecwyn, Emma ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2343-2282 and Buehner, Marc J. (2020) Temporal Binding, Causation, and Agency: Developing a New Theoretical Framework. Cognitive science, 44 (5).

[thumbnail of Cognitive Science - 2020 - Hoerl - Temporal Binding  Causation  and Agency  Developing a New Theoretical Framework.pdf]
Preview
Text
Cognitive Science - 2020 - Hoerl - Temporal Binding Causation and Agency Developing a New Theoretical Framework.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

| Preview

Abstract

In temporal binding, the temporal interval between one event and another, occurring some time later, is subjectively compressed. We discuss two ways in which temporal binding has been conceptualized. In studies showing temporal binding between a voluntary action and its causal consequences, such binding is typically interpreted as providing a measure of an implicit or pre-reflective “sense of agency.” However, temporal binding has also been observed in contexts not involving voluntary action, but only the passive observation of a cause–effect sequence. In those contexts, it has been interpreted as a top-down effect on perception reflecting a belief in causality. These two views need not be in conflict with one another, if one thinks of them as concerning two separate mechanisms through which temporal binding can occur. In this paper, we explore an alternative possibility: that there is a unitary way of explaining temporal binding both within and outside the context of voluntary action as a top-down effect on perception reflecting a belief in causality. Any such explanation needs to account for ways in which agency, and factors connected with agency, has been shown to affect the strength of temporal binding. We show that principles of causal inference and causal selection already familiar from the literature on causal learning have the potential to explain why the strength of people's causal beliefs can be affected by the extent to which they are themselves actively involved in bringing about events, thus in turn affecting binding.

Item Type: Article
Status: Published
DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12843
School/Department: School of Education, Language and Psychology
URI: https://ray.yorksj.ac.uk/id/eprint/7491

University Staff: Request a correction | RaY Editors: Update this record