Quick Search:

Author Guide for Addressing Animal Methods Bias in Publishing

Krebs, Catharine E. ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6405-2665, Camp, Celean, Constantino, Helder ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7801-1779, Courtot, Lilas ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5507-7548, Kavanagh, Owen ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2599-8511, McCarthy, Janine ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5028-0483, Ort, Melanie‐Jasmin ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5248-6071, Sarasija, Shaarika ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3610-2178 and Trunnell, Emily R. ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6320-1289 (2023) Author Guide for Addressing Animal Methods Bias in Publishing. Advanced Science, 10 (30).

[thumbnail of advs.202303226.pdf]
Preview
Text
advs.202303226.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

| Preview
[thumbnail of non-pdf-files.zip] Archive
non-pdf-files.zip - Other
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Abstract

There is growing recognition that animal methods bias, a preference for animal‐based methods where they are not necessary or where nonanimal‐based methods may already be suitable, can impact the likelihood or timeliness of a manuscript being accepted for publication. Following April 2022 workshop about animal methods bias in scientific publishing, a coalition of scientists and advocates formed a Coalition to Illuminate and Address Animal Methods Bias (COLAAB). The COLAAB has developed this guide to be used by authors who use nonanimal methods to avoid and respond to animal methods bias from manuscript reviewers. It contains information that researchers may use during 1) study design, including how to find and select appropriate nonanimal methods and preregister a research plan, 2) manuscript preparation and submission, including tips for discussing methods and choosing journals and reviewers that may be more receptive to nonanimal methods, and 3) the peer review process, providing suggested language and literature to aid authors in responding to biased reviews. The author's guide for addressing animal methods bias in publishing is a living resource also available online at animalmethodsbias.org, which aims to help ensure fair dissemination of research that uses nonanimal methods and prevent unnecessary experiments on animals.

Item Type: Article
Status: Published
DOI: 10.1002/advs.202303226
School/Department: School of Science, Technology and Health
URI: https://ray.yorksj.ac.uk/id/eprint/8521

University Staff: Request a correction | RaY Editors: Update this record