Quick Search:

Malicious Conversations: Johnsonian Hating and Early Eighteenth-Century Satire

Smith, Adam ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3938-4836 (2025) Malicious Conversations: Johnsonian Hating and Early Eighteenth-Century Satire. Journal for Eighteenth Century Studies. (In Press)

[thumbnail of 1 Smith - Hating - Revised Essay JUNE 25.pdf] Text
1 Smith - Hating - Revised Essay JUNE 25.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

[thumbnail of 1 Smith - Hating - Revised Essay JUNE 25.docx] Text
1 Smith - Hating - Revised Essay JUNE 25.docx - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Abstract

Abstract: This article examines Samuel Johnson’s complex engagement with the moral and affective dimensions of satire, focusing on his attempts to delineate between productive and pernicious forms of hatred. I explore how Johnson’s distinctions—particularly between indignation and malignity—offer a framework for reassessing early eighteenth-century satiric practice. Through comparative analysis of Alexander Pope, Johnathan Swift, and Henry Fielding, I argue that Johnsonian “good hating” privileges intention and audience effect, distinguishing satire that fosters civic discourse from that which undermines it. Ultimately, I propose that ‘good hating’ is not defined by satiric aggression but by its generative potential to elicit justified indignation and facilitate lively, productive and ongoing dialogue.

Item Type: Article
Status: In Press
Subjects: D History General and Old World > DA Great Britain > DA498-503 1714-1760
P Language and Literature > PR English literature
School/Department: School of Humanities
URI: https://ray.yorksj.ac.uk/id/eprint/14006

University Staff: Request a correction | RaY Editors: Update this record