Quick Search:

Materialism in Play: Imaginary Companions Versus Personified Objects and their relations to Later Self-talk

Davis, Paige E. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0043-9991, Kola-Palmer, Susanna, Stain, Helen and Webster, Lisa (2018) Materialism in Play: Imaginary Companions Versus Personified Objects and their relations to Later Self-talk. In: Childhood and Materiality, 7–9 May 2018, Jyväskylä, Finland. (Unpublished)

Text (Materialism in Play: Imaginary Companions Versus Personified Objects and their relations to Later Self-talk)
1006.pdf - Presentation

| Preview


Pretend play, self-talk, and the creation of imaginary companions (ICs) are normative childhood behaviors
associated with positive cognitive outcomes (Davis, Meins, & Fernyhough, 2013; Roby &
Kidd, 2008; Taylor & Carlson, 1997). When examining ICs, the convention in current research is to
combine invisible friend and personified object (PO) play because both behaviors incorporate play
with a being that has a self-created stable personality and mind. However, when examining cognitive
change, there may be developmental implications to playing with a material versus an immaterial being,
thus the conventional grouping (IC and PO combined) may not be sufficient. This study aimed to
examine differences in IC/PO status as a child and subsequent reporting of adult self-talk; the act of
talking to oneself silently or out loud. Participants consisted of 372 (261 Female) university students
aged 18 to 71 years (M = 23.83, SD = 7.90) who answered questions on whether they played with
an IC or PO in childhood based on Taylor & Carlson’s (1997) IC interview. Present self-talk behavior
was also assessed using the standardized Self-talk Scale (Brinthaupt, Hein, & Kramer 2009).
Findings were in line with previous research indicating that adults who reported playing with ICs as
children in the conventional IC grouping, used significantly more self-talk than those not reporting an
IC, F (1,325) = 6.223, p = .002. However, when groups were separated into IC, PO, and NIC, and
reanalyzed in a second ANOVA, it became clear that the PO group was responsible for the significant
differences in self-talk report between the conventional IC and NIC group. Furthermore, the PO
group was trending toward producing significantly more self-talk than the IC group p = .058. Results
will be discussed in terms of developmental trajectories focusing on two main themes. 1) The impact
of material play on the development of self-talk, focusing on how certain types of play may impact
differently on the evolution of internal dialogue. 2) How being able to interact and play with an immaterial
entity, as opposed to a material one, may result in different sociocognitive developmental
Keywords: Imaginary Companions, Personified Objects, Childhood Play, Self-talk

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Status: Unpublished
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology > BF309-499 Consciousness. Cognition. Memory
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology > BF712-724.85 Developmental psychology
School/Department: School of Education, Language and Psychology
URI: https://ray.yorksj.ac.uk/id/eprint/3469

University Staff: Request a correction | RaY Editors: Update this record