Convergent validity analysis between the Profile of Emotional Competences full-form and the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire full-form

Laborde, Sylvain, Guillen, Felix and Vaughan, Robert S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1573-7000 (2021) Convergent validity analysis between the Profile of Emotional Competences full-form and the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire full-form. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 20 (4). pp. 2542-2558.

Preview	Text Laborde2021_Article_ConvergentValidityAnalysisBetw.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. \| Preview
Preview	Text Accepted Laborde et al. - PEC and TEIQue.pdf - Accepted Version \| Preview
	Text Accepted Laborde et al. - PEC and TEIQue.docx - Accepted Version

Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-021-00531-0

Abstract

Introduction: Emotional dispositions have been found to influence outcomes and have applications in many areas, such as in the clinical, health, social, educational, and organizational domains. Specifically, they may influence individuals’ addictive behaviour tendencies. The aim of this study was to investigate the convergent validity between two questionnaires measuring individual differences linked to emotional dispositions, the Profile of Emotional Competences (PEC) full-form and the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue) full-form. Examining the convergent validity will identify the similarities and the unique aspects of each questionnaire. Our hypotheses were based on relationships displaying large effect sizes (r > .50). Methodology: A sample of 1026 participants took part in this study (Mage = 21.35 years old, age range = 18-30). Participants completed both the PEC and the TEIQue in a counterbalanced order. Results: Results indicated large overlaps between the two questionnaires, however two main differences emerged: first, the PEC allows to capture precisely the emotional dispositions at the intrapersonal and interpersonal levels, while the TEIQue mixes both levels; second, the competence “using emotions”, both for one’s own emotions and for others’ emotions, is not comprehensively reflected in the TEIQue. Discussion: Overall, the PEC may help to capture more specifically the distinction between intrapersonal and interpersonal emotional competences. Future research should investigate comparatively the criterion validity of both questionnaires with specific outcome variables. Practical implications: Future research and applied work with addiction aiming at clarifying the implication of both intrapersonal and interpersonal emotional competences may consider to rather use the PEC than the TEIQue.

Item Type:	Article
Status:	Published
DOI:	10.1007/s11469-021-00531-0
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology > BF511-593 Affection. Feeling. Emotion B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology > BF697-697.5 Differential psychology. Individuality. Self
School/Department:	School of Education, Language and Psychology
URI:	https://ray.yorksj.ac.uk/id/eprint/5140