Rock, Brian ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6868-3940, Meredith, Margaret ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4541-3821, Collins, Jane, Elbra-Ramsay, Caroline ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7281-0166, Raymond, Peter ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0462-8984 and Whitfield, Louise (2026) ‘It’s actually changed my perspective’: Spaces for genuine dialogic surprise within Initial Teacher Education (ITE) curriculum. London Review of Education. (In Press)

	Text ‘It’s actually changed my perspective’ Spaces for genuine dialogic surprise within Initial Teacher Education (ITE) curriculum.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (226kB) Request a copy
	Other (Dialogic surprise in ITE) ‘It’s actually changed my perspective’ Spaces for genuine dialogic surprise within Initial Teacher Education (ITE) curriculum.docx - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (135kB) Request a copy

Abstract

This paper draws on Martin Buber’s idea of dialogical surprise in educational experiences to consider curriculum design in Initial Teacher Education (ITE). We argue that current policy environment in England fosters a monological approach, stifling meaning making and innovation. Contributing to conversations around ITE curriculum design within a constricted policy environment in England, the research presents findings on ITE curriculum experiences of Year 3 Primary Education undergraduate student teachers who completed one of three module electives (Thinking and Philosophy for Children; Creativity in Education; Early Years Education). These modules form part of the wider ITE curriculum design at the institution in which the research was undertaken, aiming to develop student teachers’ critical thinking, reflection and personal philosophies. The study investigates student teachers’ reflections on participating in dialogue which involves recognising their own and other perspectives. When curriculum design enabled spaces for new meanings to emerge, the possibility for an interplay of voices was allowed. Arguing that dialogic spaces are effectively closed down within the main, prescribed DfE ITT framework, we add our voices to the urgent call for a less prescriptive framework which recognises the professional expertise of teacher educators in curriculum design.

Item Type:	Article
Status:	In Press
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) L Education > LB Theory and practice of education L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB1501 Primary Education L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2361 Curriculum L Education > LC Special aspects of education > LC71-120.4 Education and the state
School/Department:	School of Education, Language and Psychology
URI:	https://ray.yorksj.ac.uk/id/eprint/14651

University Staff: Request a correction | RaY Editors: Update this record